The woman who went to Auschwitz singing

Before she became a symbol of courage, Etty Hillesum was a young woman who didn’t know what to do with herself.

She was educated. She taught Russian. She dreamed of becoming a writer. She was boy-crazy, prone to daydreaming, and aware that she spent too much time staring at herself in the mirror. She worried she might inherit the mental illness that ran in her family. She described herself as a “patchwork” of contradictions—ambitious and lazy, spiritual and petty, sharp-minded and easily unsettled.

In many ways, she was just like us.

In many ways, but not all.

Because the times she lived in were nothing like ours.

Etty was a Dutch Jew in Amsterdam during the Nazi occupation. At 27, she began keeping a diary. She wrote in it for only two years, until she was murdered, along with her family, in Auschwitz.

This much we know.

What’s harder to understand is what happened within those two years.

Because somewhere between the first pages—where she wrote about her self-doubt and restlessness—and the final entries she wrote from the transit camp at Westerbork, Etty underwent a transformation so profound that even scholars struggle to explain it.

It was the early 1940s. As she was untangling herself on the page, store owners were hanging “No Jews Allowed” signs in their windows. A Jewish professor and friend of Etty’s had hanged himself. Another had been murdered. Roundups began. Tens of thousands of Jews were deported to Westerbork, the transit camp that became the grim hub of Jewish life. People were selected each week and sent “to the East,” a euphemism everyone understood but could hardly bear to speak about.

By early 1942, in the middle of all of it, she wrote:

“It’s happened to me a few times recently… I stop with bated breath and have to ask myself: is this really my life? So full, so rich, so intense and so beautiful?”

How does a person, fully aware of the horror that is coming, still experience life as beautiful? How does someone refuse to hate—not in theory, but in the face of real, relentless evil? As we’ll see, it wasn’t because she was delusional.

When the train carrying Etty and her family finally left for Auschwitz, she threw a postcard from the window. It was found along the tracks.

On it, she wrote that they had left the camp singing.

Singing.

Not because she was naive. Not because she didn’t understand what awaited her. She knew. She had seen enough to know.

And still, she chose to meet life as it was, without turning away from it, without hardening herself against it.

She refused to add even “one more atom of hatred” to the world.

She found the light in herself and radiated it outward to everyone around her.

The question is not who she was, but how she became that way. This is my attempt to untangle that how, so that we might use some of Etty’s wisdom for our own dark times.

Make space for your sorrow

Etty Hillesum believed the worst thing in the world was hatred.

And hatred, she said, begins in our refusal to face our own sorrow.

If people bore their sorrow honestly, if they made space for it inside themselves, she believed the suffering in the world would begin to lessen. She writes:

“Give your sorrow all the space and shelter in yourself that it is its due. For if everyone bears his grief honestly and courageously, the sorrow that now fills the world will abate. But if you do not clear a decent shelter for your sorrow, and instead reserve most of the space inside you for hatred and thoughts of revenge—from which new sorrows will be born for others—then sorrow will never cease in this world and will multiply.”

These four walls, or those four—what’s the difference?

Etty had built such a fortress inside herself that, despite the horror around her, she was able to continue living her own life. The Nazis had physical power over her, but they could not touch her soul.

“Within these four walls or within four other ones, what does it matter? If you have a rich inner life . . . . there probably isn’t all that much difference between the inside and outside of camp.”

There’s always a new cause for satisfaction

Each week at camp Westerbork, a list was posted. If your name was on it, you would be deported to Poland, which usually meant Auschwitz—a place no one had any illusions about.

Occasionally, a different list was posted: the names of people who would be allowed, at least temporarily, to go home. For those not on the list, the obvious reaction would be: Why them and not me?

Etty’s instinct was different.

One time, when a list was posted naming sixty people who were allowed to go home, Etty’s name was not on it. Not only did she not envy those going home, she felt fortunate to be staying, because by staying at camp, she would be able to help her parents.

“Luckily I am not one of those sixty,” she wrote to a friend, “so I can keep on protecting my parents as best I can. You see, there is always a new cause for satisfaction.”

Have faith

Victor Hugo wrote that a flourishing person is like the human eye, “which adjusts to gloom by becoming more open,” David Von Drehle writes, “‘just as the soul dilates in misfortune and in the end finds God.’” This is exactly what happened to Etty.

It was horror and terror that brought her, literally, to her knees. She “found herself” praying on the bathroom mat, moved by “a great urge from a deeper part of herself than her mind,” even as the “rational atheistic” part of her looked on in amazement and she felt embarrassed. It was God—whom she describes as the voice inside her—that she found and kept returning to as the outside world grew darker. Her faith gave her strength.

If God cannot help us, we must help Him

I’ve heard people ask—and have asked myself—if God is all-powerful, why does He let bad things happen? And if He’s not all-powerful, why pray?

“It’s not God’s fault that things go awry sometimes,” Etty wrote. “The cause lies in ourselves. And that’s what stays with me, even now, even when I’m about to be packed off to Poland with my whole family.”

She prayed:

“[…] one thing is becoming increasingly clear to me: that You cannot help us, that we must help You to help ourselves. And that is all we can manage these days and also all that really matters: that we safeguard that little piece of You, God, in ourselves. And perhaps in others as well. Alas, there doesn’t seem to be much You Yourself can do about our circumstances, about our lives. Neither do I hold You responsible. You cannot help us, but we must help You and defend Your dwelling place inside us to the last.”

Prayer was how she protected the place inside her that she could return to for refuge.

Grow independent from external things

While walking alongside her brother, Mischa, one day, Etty became overwhelmed by the thought of their eventual parting. She turned to him and said, “Perhaps we really have no future.”

“Perhaps,” Mischa replied, “but only if you take a materialist view…”

This was an essential key to her growth: the firm belief that nothing outside her could harm her. Nothing could touch the serene place inside her unless she allowed it. And she would not allow it.

“We must grow so independent of material and external things that whatever the circumstances our spirit can continue to do its work.” Even in the camps, “I shall simply have to carry everything inside me. One ought to be able to live without books, without anything. There will always be a small patch of sky above, and there will always be enough space to fold two hands in prayer.”

Destroy in yourself what you wish to destroy in others

One winter day, standing at a tram stop in occupied Amsterdam, Etty’s friend Jan asked bitterly, “What is it in human beings that makes them want to destroy others?” Etty responded, “Human beings, you say, but remember that you’re one yourself. The rottenness of others is in us, too.”

The solution to the biggest problem in the world—hatred—was introspection: “to turn inward and to root out all the rottenness there. To destroy in ourselves what we wish to destroy in others. And that seems to me the only lesson to be learned from this war. That we must look into ourselves and nowhere else.”

“Why is there war?” she mused. “Perhaps because now and then I might be inclined to snap at my neighbor.”

The materials for a good life are the same everywhere

Professor Andō Fumio says that one of Etty’s greatest achievements was recognizing that the basic materials for life are the same everywhere.

In Amsterdam or Westerbork, in a quiet room or a crowded barracks, the raw ingredients of life remained: time, attention, people, the sky, her own thoughts.

And because the essential things of life are everywhere, she was able to find beauty everywhere. She was able to be grateful for everything.

As she put it, if “in a labor camp I should die within three days, I should lie down and die and still not find life unfair.”

Everything is fine just as it is

Etty would cringe when people said things like, “We’ve got to make the best of things.” It suggested a sharp divide between the life we’re “supposed” to have and the shabby substitute we’re stuck with now. That mentality felt false to her, like pretending to be cheerful on a sinking ship.

“Everywhere things are both very good and very bad at the same time. The two are in balance, everywhere and always,” she wrote.

“I never have the feeling that I have got to make the best of things; everything is fine just as it is. Every situation, however miserable, is complete in itself and contains the good as well as the bad.”

What made her so joyful, even in a transit camp, was her ability to embrace life as a single, meaningful whole. Barbed wire and purple lupins, transports and sunsets, fear and gratitude: all of it belonged.

“Flowers and fruit grow everywhere they are planted, isn’t that what it all means?”

Refuse to hide from the world

Defying her friends’ pleas, Etty refused to hide from the Nazis. “She didn’t want to desert her parents, but more than that,” Carol Lee Flinders writes, “it just felt morally wrong to her that anyone would concentrate on personal survival who could be reaching out lovingly to others instead.”

Klaas Smelik, the man to whom she would later entrust her diaries, remembers his unsuccessful attempt to “kidnap” Etty and put her into hiding. Convinced she didn’t understand the danger she was in, he grabbed her to pull her to safety. She wriggled free, stepped back, and said, “You don’t understand me.” When he admitted he didn’t, she said, “I want to share the destiny of my people.” At that moment, he knew there was no hope of “rescuing” her. She would not allow it. Besides, she argued, what did it matter whether she went, or someone else?

And this was a woman who had everything going for her! She had family and friends, a law degree, ambition, curiosity, and a full, vibrant inner life.

Yet she refused to hide from her fate for the same reason she refused to hide from sorrow: to hide from it would be to hide from life itself. And beyond that, how could she run and hide when there were so many people around her she could help?

Listen, listen, listen

The whole of Etty’s transformation was built on something simple: listening. More specifically, listening to what was going on inside her. It was this kind of listening, practiced through journaling, that transformed her so profoundly.

Each morning, she resolved to turn inward for a half hour. “Thinking gets you nowhere,” she wrote. “You have to make yourself passive then, and just listen. […] Not thinking, but listening to what is going on inside you. If you do that for a while every morning . . . you acquire a calm that illuminates the whole day.”

Accept all of yourself so you can accept all of others

One evening, as she biked through Amsterdam to meet her brother, she fell into a sadness over some perceived flaw in herself. As she rode, her thoughts drifted to a kind university professor who had recently died in a concentration camp. The weight of it all—her own self-judgment, his death, the state of the world—began to settle in.

But instead of rejecting her feelings, she opened herself to them, realizing “that sadness, too, was part of my being.”

From this she realized that accepting all parts of herself made it easier to accept all parts of others, too.

Hardy, not hard

Perhaps one of the most amazing things about Etty was that she refused to let her heart grow numb.

That was her greatest fear: numbness of heart. To become numb would close her off to her inner life and prevent her from bearing witness to what was happening around her. “Eager as she was to affirm the inherent meaning and beauty of life, she would not permit herself to do so without at the same time recognizing the full depravity of what was going on around her,” Carol Lee Flinders writes. She “would uphold that part of the assignment she had imposed upon herself: to be an unblinkered witness to history, but one who would not give way to hatred.”

Root out personal desires and become whole

Part of Etty’s ability to resist hatred and numbness was rooted in something less obvious: her relationship to personal desire.

She noticed that her suffering often traced back to a single question—What do I want?

In 1942, she was in a low mood that lingered for days. When she looked closely, she saw the source clearly: her relationship with Spier (her therapist, with whom she had a complicated, semi-romantic relationship). Beneath her emotions, she had a longing for a physical relationship with him. She had an urge to possess him, to make him hers.

She realized her low moods were the result of a desperate need to place him at the center of her life. And here’s the paradox: when she let go of that need, it brought them closer. By no longer trying to “own” him, they were no longer two separate beings.

She learned to redirect and soften her desires. She saw more clearly the connectedness of all things. With a connection to everything, how could she hate? Hatred requires separation. It requires measuring and demanding and defending.

By lessening her desires, she was able to connect more deeply with others, with life, and, most importantly, with herself. She was becoming whole.

Let life be more than a thousand everyday cares

Etty would pray that her days be made up of more than just thoughts of food and clothing and the cold and her health. It didn’t matter if she had to sleep on a hard floor, or that she was no longer allowed on certain streets.

“These are minor vexations,” she wrote. “So insignificant compared with the infinite riches and possibilities we carry within us. […] Let every day be something more than a thousand everyday cares.”

Face the facts

She watched people around her cling to fantasies of rescue. They convinced themselves that help would come, that the war would suddenly change course, that they would be spared. She understood the longing behind those hopes, but she also saw how they kept people from engaging with the reality in front of them.

Etty was interested in the facts. More to the point, she was interested in how she could grow through the facts. Life is not an illusion or a hope for a different reality. Life is what it is—facts and everyday struggles. “Etty did not flee from this difficult situation,” writes Andō Fumio, “but regarded the facts as the meaning of life itself. She sought what she could do and achieve even under the most difficult conditions.”

Only by fully embracing this moment could she hope to fulfill her potential.

Life is one meaningful whole

Etty rejected the idea that life could be divided into what it should be and what it was. This is perhaps the most profound thing about her: that she could face unimaginable terror and still find life beautiful. Not just the obvious parts, but all of it.

During a time when she was temporarily allowed to go home, she reflected on camp Westerbork:

“How is it that this stretch of heathland surrounded by barbed wire, through which so much human misery has flooded, nevertheless remains inscribed in my memory as something almost lovely? How is it that my spirit, far from being oppressed, seemed to grow lighter and brighter there? It is because I read the signs of the times and they did not seem meaningless to me.”

She reminisced about her former life, about reading Rilke and Jung at her writing desk. Surrounded by my writers and poets and the flowers on my desk, I loved life. And there among the barracks, full of hunted and persecuted people, I found confirmation of my love of life. Life in those drafty barracks was no other than life in this protected, peaceful room. Not for one moment was I cut off from the life I was said to have left behind. There was simply one great, meaningful whole.”

To ruminate is to miss out on life

Etty understood that rumination was not the same as reflection.

She knew how things like fantasies and sad memories could distract her for days on end—to no good end. It wasn’t that there was anything inherently immoral about this, but she saw clearly that it cut her off from reality.

“Observing the people around her,” Carol Lee Flinders writes, “she sees that many of them play and replay memories of fear, grief, and anger with the same avidity she’d devoted to sexual fantasies, and that because they cannot direct their attention at will, they no longer experience life directly.”

This thought helped me fall asleep the other night. I told myself: Don’t ruminate. The things keeping you up are in your head. The reality is that you’re lying in bed. Nothing else is happening. Be where your body is. Fall into the present moment, and fall asleep.

Keep seeking beauty

Walking alongside the barbed wire fences, she would find herself overcome by how beautiful life was. The beauty of a magnolia could almost overwhelm her.

For Etty, this wasn’t just appreciation—it was survival. An eye for beauty helped preserve her humanity. It allowed her to keep seeing clearly while others were consumed by resentment and reactivity. Beauty sharpened her vision when hatred threatened to cloud it. Seeking beauty was her way of staying human.

Transcend yourself

Etty put her inner world in order, wrestled with herself, and found a deep peace. Her spiritual quest allowed her to see the world differently. It’s how she could describe the beauty of life, the birds in the sky, the peaceful purple lupins, the sun shining on her face, the barbed wire, and the mass murder.

But that inner work did not end with her. By rooting out personal desires and trivial preoccupations, she made more room in herself for other people. She became a haven for others—a person able to absorb sorrow, offer comfort, and remain present to those around her.

And that is what made her transformation transcendental.

Because if that had been the sum total of her story, if she had only retreated inward, she wouldn’t have become the person she became. What made her so remarkable is that she went beyond herself.

Each week at Westerbork, a large group of people would be chosen to board the train for Poland—the destination Auschwitz—where they would likely be murdered. If your name wasn’t called, you breathed a sigh of relief. You survived another week.

Etty did not use that reprieve to retreat further into herself. Instead, she used it to comfort terrified mothers with crying babies. She used it to write reassuring letters to friends. She used it to make sure her struggling parents had everything they needed. When she had nothing else to give, she gave kindness and humor. People described her as “radiant.” She was a light that shone everywhere she went.

“Our work can be done wherever there is a human being, be he only a camp guard,” she wrote.

And she did this work right up until the end.

Her transcendence was not about escaping the world, but about seeing it whole and choosing to remain true to herself. God and horror, beauty and atrocity…to view it all in the same frame and choose love anyway.

That is how Etty Hillesum became Etty Hillesum.

Books Read This Month

The Zorg by Siddharth Kara
Wow. I’d never even heard of the Zorg before, let alone understood its role in sparking the abolitionist movement in England and the United States. In 1781, the crew crammed the ship with 442 enslaved people on a voyage to Jamaica. After a series of events—bad weather, navigational errors—the ship veered off course, and supplies began to dwindle. What happened next is almost impossible to comprehend. In an effort to “save lives,” they began throwing people overboard, starting with women and children. Shackled together, often in pairs, people were dragged to the edge of the ship, screaming and begging for their lives, and thrown into the ocean to drown. It was the systematic murder of 133 people. Why? Mostly money. The slaves had been so malnourished and mistreated that they would likely sell for far less than expected. And because they were insured “property,” they’d be worth more dead than alive. When news of the massacre spread, it forced people to confront the true brutality of slavery. True to form, pro-slavery activists used the Bible to defend it. Reverend Raymond Harris “asserted that, ‘the slave-trade . . . appears in perfect harmony with the principles and decisions of the word of God,’ and that Jesus ‘never once condemned, reproved, or even hinted the least disapprobation of the practices of slavery . . . not even in his divine Sermon on the Mount.’” Another slavery supporter, William Gregson, argued that financial catastrophe would occur if slavery was abolished. To which I wrote in the margins: then you be a slave. It’s a hard book to stomach. But the storytelling and historical detail make it readable and unforgettable.

Don’t Give Up, Don’t Give In by Louis Zamperini
My good friend recommended this, and I’m so glad she did. Most people know Louis Zamperini’s story on the surface: Olympic runner, World War II bombardier, prisoner of war. What he endured is almost incomprehensible. What I loved about this book—a collection of advice written near the end of his life—is how he remained cheerful through it all. He laments how you can’t watch sports today without seeing someone lose ungraciously. He talks about hatred and, like Etty Hillesum, believed hatred was a ruse. “You hate and hate and hate, and think you’re getting even by hating.” But you’re really just destroying yourself. That’s the trap. After everything he went through, maybe the hardest part wasn’t surviving. Maybe it was deciding what to do with it all: Carry it? Or put it down and free yourself? And maybe that’s what “not giving up” really means—not just surviving what happens to you, but like Etty—refusing to let it turn you into someone you don’t want to be. Refusing to let jerks turn you into a jerk. Really, really great book.

Football by Chuck Klosterman
Oh my goodness, this book was so much fun. This guy is one of the weirdest, most interesting thinkers I’ve read. He overthinks everything in the most entertaining way. He takes football and uses it as a launching pad into bigger questions about time, culture, and what we choose to value. This isn’t really a book about football. It’s a book about how we think about football. And from there, how we think about everything else. This guy has thought about football in pretty much every context you can imagine. He even argues—convincingly—that Jim Thorpe was a greater football player than Tom Brady. And there’s not even video footage of Thorpe playing football!He said NFL football will continue to grow in the U.S. over the next 15–20 years, but eventually it will become too big. And when that happens, it will break. As obsessed as Americans are with football now, he suggests that in 50 years, it will probably be irrelevant. This sounds ridiculous at first, but he has valid points. And this got me thinking. If something as massive as football can eventually fade into irrelevance…what does that say about everything else we chase? Fame. Legacy. Being “the greatest” at the expense of our happiness. Not only will you not be able to enjoy your legend status because you’ll be, you know, dead, but the people who think of you as a legend will in turn be dead themselves. The next generations probably won’t even know your name, let alone what the thing was that you were great at. This is all to say: nobody cares what you do. So do things that are meaningful to you. Spend time with your parents. Take the vacation. Explore. People talk about hustling 24/7 like it’s a good thing. They hustle just to do more hustling! (Usually it’s because they don’t know what else to do with themselves.) It reminds me of something Marcus Aurelius wrote: You’re afraid of death because you won’t be able to do this anymore?” In other words, what you do matters, but not nearly as much as how you live.

What It Is Like to Go to War by Karl Marlantes
This war memoir is epic. I couldn’t put it down. It’s so well-written that I had to order another book of his, Matterhorn. Marlantes warns about what war does to a person internally. He argues that we do a great job physically preparing soldiers for war, but a terrible job giving them the tools to survive mentally and spiritually. He talks about the guilt and anger and confusion of trying to reconcile being a “good person” with the atrocities the war enables one to commit. I just love how brutally honest he is. And while I didn’t agree with everything he said, I still think it’s one of the best books I’ve ever read. It’s raw, insightful, full of action, and reflective. I think you’ll love it too.

This is the main thing I learned in CPR training—and it applies to everything else

A few weeks ago, my wife, Courtney, stabbed herself.

She meant to stab the sweet potato in her hand, but missed. The point of the steak knife plunged into the meaty part of her left palm, above her wrist, and a geyser of blood shot across the kitchen island.

I went from innocently peeling the shell off a hard-boiled egg to feeling absolute terror in a matter of seconds.

Courtney—who never even tells me when she has a headache, let alone goes to the doctor for anything that isn’t absolutely necessary—pushed a dish towel into the gash and calmly said, “We have to go, now.”

I didn’t know where she’d cut herself—if she’d sliced open her wrist or hit something important. All I could think was that the human body only holds six pints of blood (which I now know isn’t true; it’s closer to ten) and that she was bleeding badly.

I ran to the garage and yelled, “Get in the car!” I had the wherewithal to grab her ID, but that was it. I didn’t even put shoes on. I flew out of the driveway and broke approximately fifteen traffic laws in the two miles between our house and the ER.

I slammed the car into park at the entrance and rushed her through the sliding doors. Shaking and out of breath, I asked a nurse in the lobby to take a look. As she pulled off the towel, I warned her to be careful; blood might still be squirting. I cringed as I looked to see how bad it was and… it actually didn’t look too bad. The dish towel was soaked end to end in blood, but the bleeding had stopped.

Maybe I had overreacted.

A doctor saw us within twenty minutes, cleaned out the wound, patched it up, and sent us on our way.

When we got home, I replayed everything in my mind. Why had I run around like a chicken with its head cut off? Why was I so unprepared? I felt guilty. I decided never again would I feel so helpless. There’s no excuse for not being prepared. So I watched videos on the Heimlich maneuver, bought a LifeVac travel kit, a second fire extinguisher, and hemostatic gauze, and signed us up for a CPR/First Aid class at the Red Cross.

The class was three and a half hours long, and there were nine other students. On a wall-mounted TV, the instructor played the first video: how to properly wash your hands. Courtney turned to me and whispered, “You owe me for this.”

After that, the instructor briefly discussed the material we would learn. She warned that if you save someone’s life, don’t let them repay you with, say, a steak dinner. This could lead to a lawsuit. Courtney grabbed the pocket journal I brought to take notes and wrote, “Do not accept steak dinners.” I had to bite my tongue to keep from laughing.

The next video showed an elderly woman having symptoms of a heart attack. “Honey, what’s wrong?” her alert husband asks. “I’m having chest pains,” she replies. “No, no, no, this isn’t happening,” he moans. Just then, their son—clearly the hero—enters the room.

My journal open, pen at the ready, I leaned forward. Here we go. The secrets of how to save a life were about to be revealed and I, Emily Yaskowitz, would henceforth be prepared to do just that—save lives. What’s the son going to do? I thought. What at-home machine has he invested in that will now pay off and save her life? What tricks would he perform?

The son asks his mom what’s wrong. “I’m having pain in my chest,” she winces. Turning to his dad, the son says, “Call 9-1-1.” He turns back to his mother. “Here,” he says, “chew these aspirins.” The woman chews and rubs her chest while they wait for help. When the first responders arrive, they load her onto a gurney and send her away in an ambulance. The dad is overwhelmed with gratitude. “Son, I don’t know what I would have done without you.” The video ends.

By this point I wanted my money back.

Forty-five minutes in and we’d learned not to accept gifts and to call 9-1-1 in an emergency.

Over the next few hours, though, we practiced CPR on dummies, tied tourniquets, and learned what to do if someone is having a seizure or going into shock. Still, most of what we talked about wasn’t new. By the time the class was over, I realized that was the whole point.

I recently read that Minnesota Vikings head coach Kevin O’Connell briefly played quarterback in the NFL. He threw six passes as a New England Patriot and was cut after one year. He then signed with the Lions and was traded five days later. He auditioned for teams constantly, and it rarely went well. As Seth Wickersham writes, “He always wanted to create ‘the wow factor,’ […] an exceptional throw that would make a team believe. ‘I learned that’s the last possible thing you should do,’ he says now.”

He learned that good quarterbacking involves taking care of the mundane. “He watched Brady and Joe Montana execute game-winning drives in the Super Bowl. What stood out was how unspectacular they were when the stakes were the highest. ‘If they called the same play in the middle of spring practice, they would have executed it the same way,’ [O’Connell] says. ‘They weren’t trying to do anything other than just play the position consistently at a high level.’”

That’s what I learned in the CPR class. It’s about executing the basics—preparing and practicing.

“We don’t rise to the level of our expectations,” the Greek poet Archilochus said. “We fall to the level of our training.”

It’s not about dramatic heroics, but consistent steadiness.

That’s true in the ER, and it’s true everywhere else.

No matter how many influencers or life hacks there are, I’ve yet to find a better prescription for a good life than this: go to bed early, get up early, journal, read, exercise, do the right thing, care about others, and eat decently.

Do these things consistently and in a few years you’ll be a different person.

But that’s the thing: we already know this. The problem is that it’s terribly unsexy. It’s boring. That’s why there’s always a new life hack or mud cleanse or cage-free yoga class or whatever.

It’s why someone will attend a self-help seminar or watch motivating YouTube videos and still never change. The important stuff is often so straightforward—like calling 9-1-1 or calmly applying pressure to a wound—that it can be easily overlooked.

We know we should save and invest—that fortunes aren’t made from windfalls but from small, consistent savings. We know we keep our job not because we have a revolutionary idea, but because we show up each day and stay steady. “Your teeth don’t not rot because you go to the dentist twice a year,” Simon Sinek said. “They don’t rot because you brush them for a couple minutes every day. It’s the little things adding up over time.”

Four years ago I could barely run half a block without stopping. Last week I spontaneously ran a 4.5 mile route—one I’ve never run before—in a little over a half hour, and I could have kept going. And I’m not saying that to sound impressive, because it’s not impressive. What else is supposed to happen when you run three to four miles a day, four days a week, for four years, while gradually increasing your speed?

I fell to the level of my training.

Bob Dylan didn’t wake up one morning and write “Blowin’ in the Wind” because genius struck. “These songs don’t come out of thin air,” he said. “If you sang ‘John Henry’ as many times as me—if you had sung that song as many times as I did, you’d have written, ‘How many roads must a man walk down?’ too.”

He sang the same old songs so many times that when he began to write his own lyrics, he felt like he “was just extending the line.”

He fell to the level of his training.

Feeling confident in an emergency is less about skill than preparation. You don’t need to know how to perform an emergency thoracotomy, but you should have the Heimlich maneuver down pat. You should be prepared enough that if an emergency happens, you can keep your head and assess the situation calmly—exactly the opposite of what I did when I showed up at the ER in my socks.

This matters in big things and small ones. Brilliance and willpower are unreliable.

We fall to the level of our training.

That’s true in an ER lobby. It’s true in your finances, your career, your whole life.

It comes down to doing the most important, basic things consistently.

Go to bed early.
Get up early.
Journal.
Read.
Move your body.
Tell the truth.
Do the right thing.
Go easy on the sweets.

Simple.

Far from easy.

But simple.

Books read this month

Moral Animal by Robert Wright
I love evolutionary science, and this book deepened that love. It reinforced what I first learned in Wright’s other book Why Buddhism Is True: our genes don’t care about our happiness; they care about getting into the next generation. So many of our “choices” are driven by wiring we can’t see. It’s unsettling how unaware we are of the forces shaping us. But it’s hopeful too. Once we see our blind spots, we can question our impulses and make better choices.

C.S. Lewis and the Art of Writing by Corey Latta
I loved this book. It builds on the advice collected in On Writing by C.S. Lewis but goes deeper. Latta doesn’t just share Lewis’s writing principles—he explores the conditions that made Lewis’s writing possible. What shaped him? What fueled that kind of output? How did he actually work? One of the biggest takeaways for me was how widely and deeply Lewis read. As a young boy, he devoured books in the attic of his family home, wandering through myth, history, poetry, and story. By adulthood, he was one of the most well-read writers of his generation. Like Bob Dylan, C.S. Lewis’s genius didn’t come out of nowhere. He read book after book… and then he extended the line.

Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity by Peter Attia
My good friend recommended this a while ago, and I’m finally reading it. Oh man, this book is so good. I’m only halfway through, but I’ve already made changes to my diet. I even stopped eating cupcakes and ice cream on the weekends (and me and cupcakes and ice cream were like this 🤞). When a reputable physician writes his magnum opus and page after page details the dangers of poor metabolic health—how it underlies nearly every major disease of aging—you sit up and take note. And you make changes. It’s only been a few weekends since I cut out my excessive sugar intake, and I’m determined to keep it up. This quote by Henri Amiel has been helping: “Every desire abates, and every vice grows after it is satisfied.” I’ve also been thinking about what Leo Tolstoy said—that all behavior stems from thoughts. So if you want to improve your behavior, first work to improve your thoughts. Please read this book. You really have to.

Till We Have Faces by C.S. Lewis
Corey Latta said this is Lewis’s best literary fiction, so of course I had to read it. It’s not my usual go-to genre, but I ended up really liking it. A favorite takeaway is the meaning behind the book’s title: we can’t expect God to meet us face to face “till we have faces.” Until we’re honest with ourselves. Until we get clear about who we are. Until we move past the tangle of thoughts and get to what’s truly in our heart. Becoming our real selves is uncomfortable, but it’s the prerequisite for transcending ourselves.

The Screwtape Letters by C.S. Lewis
Okay. I knew C.S. Lewis was a genius, but I didn’t know he was a genius genius. This book blew my mind. (By page 68 I’d already written “Wow!” or “omg” 72 times.) I’m putting it in my top 10 favorite books of all time. I remember reading parts of this book as a teenager and loving it, but I never finished it. Thankfully, I picked it back up this month after learning, in C.S. Lewis and the Art of Writing, why Lewis wrote it. The premise is brilliant: a series of letters from Screwtape, a senior demon, to his nephew, advising him on how to subtly steer humans away from God/what’s best for them. The wisdom in this book surpasses almost any other book I’ve read. I’ve also ordered more of Lewis’s books, including Mere Christianity, The Great Divorce, The Weight of Glory, and Surprised by Joy.

Take a Closer Look

Look at your fish

In 1864, a young man named Samuel Scudder arrived at Harvard to interview with the celebrated biologist Louis Agassiz. He likely expected a conventional test—something meant to measure what he knew, or to probe his intellect.

Instead, Agassiz placed a preserved fish in front of him and gave a single instruction: “Look at your fish.” Then he walked out of the room.

As Ryan Holiday writes in Wisdom Takes Work, hours passed. Scudder fought boredom. He examined the fish from every angle he could think of. He handled it, turned it over, traced its contours, counted its scales. Maybe it was a test of patience. With nothing else to do, he drew it.

When Agassiz returned, he was unimpressed. He told Scudder that he hadn’t truly seen the fish yet and urged him to look again. Then he left.

This pattern continued for days.

Each time Agassiz returned, he asked what Scudder had observed. Each time, the answer fell short. Eventually, Scudder could only admit the truth: “I see how little I saw before.”

That admission marked a turning point. After another long stretch of uninterrupted looking, something finally clicked. Scudder began to notice the fish’s underlying order—its symmetry, the way its organs mirrored one another on both sides. When he offered this observation, Agassiz responded with enthusiasm: “Of course! Of course!” When Scudder asked what he should do next, Agassiz replied, “Look at your fish.”

In the end, Scudder discovered… well, nothing.

But as Scudder later explained, “it was a deeper lesson,” Ryan writes, “perhaps the most important one he ever got in his career as a scientist: the power of focus. The importance of intensely looking, with dedication and without interruption, at something as simple and ordinary as a fish in order to truly see it. It was, [Scudder said], ‘a lesson whose influence has extended to the details of every subsequent study; a legacy the Professor had left to me, as he has left it to many others, of inestimable value, which we could not buy, with which we cannot part.’”

David McCullough uses this story in his writing classes. “Seeing is so important in this work,” he said. “Insight comes, more often than not, from looking at what’s been on the table all along, in front of everybody, rather than from discovering something new. Seeing is as much the job of a historian as it is of a poet or a painter, it seems to me. That’s Dickens’ great admonition to all writers, ‘Make me see.’”

Nobody bothered to look closely enough

David McCullough recalls his own Agassiz Jr. moment while writing Mornings on Horseback. He was trying to understand what had caused Theodore Roosevelt’s severe asthma attacks as a boy—episodes so intense they sometimes left his family fearing for his life.

McCullough consulted physicians. One asked whether there had been a cat or dog in the house, or whether the attacks coincided with pollen season. A psychosomatic specialist wondered if they happened around emotionally charged events like birthdays and holidays.

Using young Theodore’s diary entries, McCullough made a calendar of what he did each day. “In pencil, I wrote where he was, who was with him, what was going on, and in red ink I put squares around the days of the asthma attacks. But a little like Scudder and the fish, I couldn’t see a pattern.”

Then one day, as he looked at the calendar on his desk, he noticed something: every asthma attack happened on a Sunday. McCullough asked himself what Sundays meant in Theodore’s childhood. And then the answer became clear. If Theodore had an asthma attack on Sunday, he didn’t have to do something he hated: go to church. Instead, he got to go to the country with his father—just the two of them. For young Theodore, this was heaven.

This didn’t mean that the asthma attacks were planned, but the anxiety brought on by the prospect of going to church likely triggered them. (A high price to pay, because the attacks were horrible.) Other things may have contributed to the attacks, but the Sunday pattern was too pronounced to be coincidental.

“The chances of finding a new piece are fairly remote—though I’ve never written a book where I didn’t find something new—but it’s more likely you see something that’s been around a long time that others haven’t seen. Sometimes it derives from your own nature, your own interests. More often, it’s just that nobody bothered to look closely enough.”

What had been there all along

DNA is the master cookbook of who we are and how we function. Its sibling, RNA, is the messenger. RNA tells our cells what to do.

In the early 1980s, scientists had discovered something crucial: RNA could replicate itself—by itself. “If some RNA molecules could store genetic information and also act as a catalyst to spur chemical reactions,” Walter Isaacson explains, “they might be more fundamental to the origins of life than DNA, which cannot naturally replicate themselves without the presence of proteins to serve as a catalyst.”

In 1998, biochemist Jennifer Doudna was on a mission: to show how, exactly, RNA could replicate itself. First she would need to know what an RNA model looked like. Back in the 1970s, researchers had mapped the structure of smaller, simpler RNA molecules. But when it came to larger RNAs, progress stalled. For nearly twenty years, scientists found it difficult to isolate them clearly enough to understand their structure. “Colleagues told Doudna that getting a good image of a large RNA molecule would, at that time, be a fool’s errand.”

But if she wanted “to understand the workings of a self-splicing piece of RNA, she would have to fully discern its structure, atom by atom”—something most scientists at the time believed would be too difficult, if not impossible, to do. “Hardly anyone was trying anymore,” famed biologist Jack Szostak recalls.

It took two years, but Doudna and her partner, Jamie Cate, did it. They produced a working model of the structure of an RNA molecule—work that would eventually lay the foundation for CRISPR, the most widely used gene-editing system today.

When they started, RNA was old news. But by giving it sustained, almost stubborn attention, they discovered something entirely new.

It hadn’t been impossible after all. It’s just that no one else bothered to look closely enough at what had been there all along.

Scroll to Top