In the 1950s, a Johns Hopkins biologist named Curt Richter dropped rats into glass cylinders half-filled with water and watched them swim.
The rats paddled around in frantic little circles, searching for a way out. Richter, as Nir Eyal writes, sat nearby with a stopwatch and recorded how long they kept going before they stopped trying.
Most lasted around fifteen minutes.
What’s interesting is that the rats were not drowning from exhaustion. Their muscles still worked, their lungs were fine. They had just decided, in their little rat brains, there was no point.
So Richter ran the experiment again, but with one small change.
He dropped a fresh group of rats in and watched them swim. Right when each one was about to give up, he reached in, scooped the rat out, dried it off, let it catch its breath, and plopped it back in the water.
How much longer would you guess those rats swam?
Thirty minutes? An hour? Double their original time? Triple it?
The answer: sixty hours.
Not sixty minutes. Sixty hours. Two and a half straight days of paddling. Roughly the amount of time it takes elite ultra-marathon swimmers to swim from Cuba to Florida.
They were the same type of rats as the first batch, with the same bodies. The only difference was that they now believed rescue was possible.
When I’m on the treadmill and my breathing is labored, I think about the rats.
I think about the rats when a blister on my foot is screaming, or when my mouth is painfully dry. Basically, I think about the rats when my brain is begging me to quit, but my body is still capable of continuing.
Marcus Aurelius said it’s shameful for the mind to give up when the body is still going strong. That’s what the rats remind me of. With the first group of rats, their minds had given up before their bodies.
The second group didn’t suddenly become stronger. They didn’t get better at swimming. Nothing about the water changed.
They had been pulled out once before. They knew, in whatever small way rats know things, that rescue could come.
So they kept swimming.
Their only job was to keep going.
Don’t Get Stuck in Preparation
Before landing roles in Euphoria and The White Lotus, Lukas Gage struggled to break into the industry.
At eighteen, he moved to LA and enrolled in an acting class while searching for an agent. But it turned out to be harder than he imagined. No one would talk to him. Maybe he just wasn’t cut out to be an actor.
Feeling low, he asked his acting teacher, Leigh Kilton-Smith, if she had a moment to talk. He confessed his doubts about his abilities.
“I really need you to tell me the truth,” he said. “What’s the worst thing about my acting?”
“You know my biggest criticism right now of where you are in your career,” she said. “I see your plan.”
“What?”
“Did I stutter? I said I see your plan. I see that you’ve done the work and now a day later you’re stuck in preparation, and you haven’t done the necessary work to let your plan go. [. . .] You’re relying on your plan, and that’s when your work runs the chance of being dull and uninteresting. You’re many things, Lukas, but uninteresting ain’t one of them.”
He thought he might cry. She was right, he knew, but he wasn’t ready to fully accept it.
“But if I don’t know what’s going to happen—”
Suddenly, something flew toward his head.
Reflexively, he reached out and grabbed it: a tissue box his teacher had thrown at him.
“What the actual fuck?”
“Bet you didn’t see that coming, did you?”
He had not.
“And yet you caught it. You didn’t have to think about it. You didn’t have to reference any notes on how to catch a tissue box being thrown at your head by your crazy acting teacher. You simply caught it, instinct kicked in, and you were in a state of trust.”
“Trust!” she continued. “Trust in yourself. It’s what’s missing from your characters, and from you, Lukas. The art suffers and runs the risk of looking and feeling and smelling and being like everyone else.”
Trust.
That was it.
The work he’d already done was in him. He didn’t need to cling to the plan anymore. He needed to trust himself enough to let it go.
“I can only say all this,” she added, “because I’m also deeply and profoundly afraid every moment of every day. I am a fuckup, I’m a fraud, but either I trust my life experiences and my path or I become the world’s oldest hooker.”
“Fuck you: you know how to do this.”
Early in his career, Breaking Bad star Bryan Cranston was auditioning constantly.
After each audition, he would pace by the phone, anxious to hear if he had gotten the part.
“And then when I heard I didn’t get the part, I’d marinate in disappointment and introspection. Could I have done something differently?”
His wife eventually set him up with a self-help coach, who told Cranston he needed to focus on the process, not the outcome.
That’s when everything changed.
By detaching from the outcome, Cranston put himself back in control. He realized auditions weren’t about competing with other actors. They were about giving something.
“I wasn’t there to get a job. I was there to do a job. Simple as that. I was there to give a performance.” Whether or not he got the part was not up to him, and therefore not his concern. Instead of pacing by the phone after each audition, he would throw the script in a basket when he got home and forget about it.
“I’d let go. You can’t fake letting go. You have to really genuinely detach from it. If I’d get a callback, I’d fish out the script and say, ‘Oh yeah, I remember this guy.’”
Auditioning became enjoyable.
How could it not?
With the outcome no longer in charge, with his trust placed in himself and in the work instead of the result, he walked into each audition holding all the power.
That’s the thing about trusting yourself: it’s more a decision than a feeling.
When Christina Applegate first started working on the set of Anchorman, she had never done improv comedy. She walked around asking anyone who would listen, “Teach me, Obi-Wan.”
Steve Carell insisted that she didn’t need to be taught. She could do it on her own.
When You Are Engulfed in Flames by David Sedaris One of my favorite reading memories from when I was younger was sitting on the couch in my parents’ house and cracking open a new David Sedaris book. Ones likeDress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim,Me Talk Pretty One Day, andNaked. That’s why I’m so excited that his newest book,The Land and Its People came out this week! My wife and I went to see him earlier this month at the Orpheum Theater and we cracked up the whole time. He’s just so damn funny. It made me want to reread an old favorite,When You Are Engulfed in Flames. I’ve yet to read another author who so accurately—and so side-splittingly—captures the absurdity of daily life.
Good Writing: 36 Ways to Improve Your Sentences by Neal Allen and Anne Lamott I found this book while browsing the shelves of Changing Hands, and when I saw it was co-written by Anne Lamott, author ofBird by Bird, I bought it on the spot. There are so many gems of writing advice here. One favorite: “Spend less time defending what you’ve written and more time revealing the truth.” Lamott writes that when she edits her own work she removes anything “that put me in a more sympathetic/desperate light so the reader will feel sorry for me or anxious on my behalf, and like me more,” and that there is nothing more stunning than the truth presented carefully and unvarnished. I just love that. On a similar note, a huge piece of writing—and life—advice I’ve been thinking about is Ryan Holiday’s positive contribution every day rule. Seriously, read this article. And if you like to write, read this book.
London Fallingby Patrick Radden Keefe Oh my goodness, I LOVED this book. It’s one of the best I’ve read this year. Keefe is a master of narrative tension. The slow-but-propulsive unfolding of the story made it almost impossible to put down—I needed to know the motives of the people at the center of it all. In that way, it reminded me of—dare I say—the true crime classicIn Cold Blood. You find yourself needing to know how the cast of characters came together, what stories they told themselves and others, and how the chain of choices led them where they ended up. It’s seriously so good. (Also, on a semi-related note, crime writer Patricia Cornwell published her memoir this month, and it looks really good.)
Inside the Box: How Constraints Make Us Betterby David Epstein I wasn’t sure if this book would be gimmicky, but I gave it a shot because I loved his bookRange. This one is just as good, maybe better. We tend to think unlimited time, money, and freedom would solve our creative and business problems. It turns out what we often need are constraints: rigid limits, real or self-imposed, that force us to think more clearly and creatively. From some of the biggest companies to the most influential artists, from Steve Jobs to Johann Sebastian Bach, Epstein argues that constraints were not just the catalyst but the key ingredient in their success. It’s fascinating, and on top of that, it’s well-written and easy to read. It reminded me of the ideas in one of my favorite books on creativity, Austin Kleon’sSteal Like an Artist. (Btw, Kleon’s newest bookDon’t Call It Art: 10 Ways to Create Like a Kid Again comes out next month!)
Misc: I also read and loved Christina Applegate’s memoirYou With the Sad Eyes, which is where the Anchorman story above came from.
I changed up my reading plan this year: fewer books, more time with each one—wrestling with the ideas instead of just collecting them.
This month I read 1929: Inside the Greatest Crash in Wall Street History—and How it Shattered a Nation. It sent me down a rabbit hole—hours with ChatGPT, filling gaps in my investment knowledge, and asking it to explain things in new ways so I could understand. Then I actually did something about it, and made a few moves I’d been circling for months.
Knowledge is the easy part. Implementation is harder. And much, much more valuable.
In late 1928, Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin—an achievement hailed as one of the greatest inventions in any field. But for over a decade, penicillin had done practically nothing for humanity. It wasn’t until millions of dollars and hundreds of American scientists and engineers modified the production process, established clinical trials, and distributed the drug at scale that penicillin became viable. By March 1945—seventeen years after its invention—enough penicillin existed for nearly every person in America. Fleming won the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine.
We tend to view inventions as these great Eureka moments. Edison’s lightbulb in 1879. The Wright brothers’ airplane in 1903. The big names everyone knows: Franklin, Bell, Tesla. It’s the Hollywood tale of the hero inventing something that saves the world.
“But this approach to history is worse than incomplete: it’s downright wrong,” write Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson in Abundance. “Implementation, not mere invention, determines the pace of progress.”
“‘Most major inventions initially don’t work very well,’ the economic historian Joel Mokyr said. ‘They have to be tweaked, the way the steam engine was tinkered with by many engineers over decades. They have to be embodied by infrastructure, the way nuclear fission can’t produce useful electricity until it’s contained inside a working reactor. And they have to be built at scale, the way Ford’s Model T came down in price before it made a big difference to the country.’”
In short, inventions need what Mokyr calls microinventions—“incremental improvements needed to turn a new idea into a significant product.”
Think of what Edison actually did.
In his lab, he tested hundreds of materials by burning them in a glass vacuum before discovering that carbonized bamboo worked as a lightbulb filament.
But inventing the bulb, Edison understood, was only part of the job.
If electric light was going to work in people’s lives, he needed to build the whole system around it—generators to produce the power, wires to carry it, sockets and switches to control it, and meters to track how much electricity people used so they could be billed.
“Edison did not make electric light possible,” Klein and Thompson continue, “But his microinventions did something more important: Through exhaustive tinkering, embodying, and scaling, he made electric light useful.”
In the late 1990s, Jennifer Doudna and her partner Jamie Cate produced a working model of an RNA molecule—the foundation of CRISPR, the most widely used gene-editing system today.
And here’s what’s interesting: scientists had already known about RNA for decades. But by implementing, by microinventing, Doudna and her team made RNA useful.
And this isn’t just for scientists.
At age 84, with a career spanning more than six decades, Bob Dylan is still writing, recording, and performing. He’s become an object of study: where does his creativity come from?
“These songs don’t come out of thin air,” he says. “If you sang ‘John Henry’ as many times as me—‘John Henry was a steel-driving man / Died with a hammer in his hand / John Henry said a man ain’t nothin’ but a man / Before I let that steam drill drive me down / I’ll die with that hammer in my hand.’ If you had sung that song as many times as I did, you’d have written, ‘How many roads must a man walk down?’ too. All these songs are connected. I just opened up a different door in a different kind of way. . . . I thought I was just extending the line.”
He discovered the music he loved, then implemented it into his own creativity kit. Microinventing, one line at a time.
If I had to sum up 2026 so far in a word, it would be implementation.
I signed my wife and me up for a CPR class and stocked up on first aid supplies. I pulled the trigger on a few investments I’d been sitting on. I’ve folded George Raveling’s line—choose to be happy, or very happy—into my daily affirmations. And I spent months immersed in Peter Attia’s Outlive, swapping in his diet and exercise advice until the scale started moving. I’m down 25 pounds so far.
Knowledge without action is like buying a “Come and Take It” bumper sticker but driving a Prius. The aggression is there, but the outlet isn’t.
Knowing is the easy part. The value is in the doing.
As mentioned, I’ve been trying to be more discerning—yet less structured—in my reading, and spend more time putting ideas into actions. I didn’t read as many books this month as I typically do, but I ended up enjoying the experience a lot more. I dipped in and out of some old favorites, like David Sedaris’s Happy Go Lucky andWhen You Are Engulfed in Flames. I also read Lukas Gage’s memoirI Wrote This for Attention, which was a random choice for me but I LOVED it. I read How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States by Daniel Immerwahr which was eye-opening. I’ve also been making my way throughThe Wisdom of Marcus Aurelius by Robin Waterfield, as well as—for the ninth time—A Calendar of Wisdom by Leo Tolstoy. I credit Tolstoy’s wisdom and teachings—Christian teachings, mind you—for turning me into such a flaming leftist. Oh, and if you haven’t heard, Anne Lamott and her husband, Neal Allen, released a new book in March:Good Writing: 36 Ways to Improve Your Sentences. I’m only a few chapters in and it is fantastic.
One of the best books I read this month was1929: Inside the Greatest Crash in Wall Street History—and How it Shattered a Nation by Andrew Ross Sorkin. Oh my goodness, it’s SO good. A 400+ page book about the Wall Street crash sounds like a remedy for insomnia, but it’s the opposite. I actually had a hard time going to sleep because I wanted to stay up and keep reading. The book follows the main players—the financiers, bankers, and government figures who helped fuel the speculation and then had to deal with the fallout—all from a fly-on-the-wall perspective. One especially fascinating thread is Carter Glass, who seems to have had a personal vendetta against National City Bank president Charles Mitchell. It’s all riveting. And Sorkin is such a fantastic writer that you often forget he’s the one doing the writing at all.
Before she became a symbol of courage, Etty Hillesum was a young woman who didn’t know what to do with herself.
She was educated. She taught Russian. She dreamed of becoming a writer. She was boy-crazy, prone to daydreaming, and aware that she spent too much time staring at herself in the mirror. She worried she might inherit the mental illness that ran in her family. She described herself as a “patchwork” of contradictions—ambitious and lazy, spiritual and petty, sharp-minded and easily unsettled.
In many ways, she was just like us.
In many ways, but not all.
Because the times she lived in were nothing like ours.
Etty was a Dutch Jew in Amsterdam during the Nazi occupation. At 27, she began keeping a diary. She wrote in it for only two years, until she was murdered, along with her family, in Auschwitz.
This much we know.
What’s harder to understand is what happened within those two years.
Because somewhere between the first pages—where she wrote about her self-doubt and restlessness—and the final entries she wrote from the transit camp at Westerbork, Etty underwent a transformation so profound that even scholars struggle to explain it.
It was the early 1940s. As she was untangling herself on the page, store owners were hanging “No Jews Allowed” signs in their windows. A Jewish professor and friend of Etty’s had hanged himself. Another had been murdered. Roundups began. Tens of thousands of Jews were deported to Westerbork, the transit camp that became the grim hub of Jewish life. People were selected each week and sent “to the East,” a euphemism everyone understood but could hardly bear to speak about.
By early 1942, in the middle of all of it, she wrote:
“It’s happened to me a few times recently… I stop with bated breath and have to ask myself: is this really my life? So full, so rich, so intense and so beautiful?”
How does a person, fully aware of the horror that is coming, still experience life as beautiful? How does someone refuse to hate—not in theory, but in the face of real, relentless evil? As we’ll see, it wasn’t because she was delusional.
When the train carrying Etty and her family finally left for Auschwitz, she threw a postcard from the window. It was found along the tracks.
On it, she wrote that they had left the camp singing.
Singing.
Not because she was naive. Not because she didn’t understand what awaited her. She knew. She had seen enough to know.
And still, she chose to meet life as it was, without turning away from it, without hardening herself against it.
She refused to add even “one more atom of hatred” to the world.
She found the light in herself and radiated it outward to everyone around her.
The question is not who she was, but how she became that way. This is my attempt to untangle that how, so that we might use some of Etty’s wisdom for our own dark times.
Make space for your sorrow
Etty Hillesum believed the worst thing in the world was hatred.
And hatred, she said, begins in our refusal to face our own sorrow.
If people bore their sorrow honestly, if they made space for it inside themselves, she believed the suffering in the world would begin to lessen. She writes:
“Give your sorrow all the space and shelter in yourself that it is its due. For if everyone bears his grief honestly and courageously, the sorrow that now fills the world will abate. But if you do not clear a decent shelter for your sorrow, and instead reserve most of the space inside you for hatred and thoughts of revenge—from which new sorrows will be born for others—then sorrow will never cease in this world and will multiply.”
These four walls, or those four—what’s the difference?
Etty had built such a fortress inside herself that, despite the horror around her, she was able to continue living her own life. The Nazis had physical power over her, but they could not touch her soul.
“Within these four walls or within four other ones, what does it matter? If you have a rich inner life . . . . there probably isn’t all that much difference between the inside and outside of camp.”
There’s always a new cause for satisfaction
Each week at camp Westerbork, a list was posted. If your name was on it, you would be deported to Poland, which usually meant Auschwitz—a place no one had any illusions about.
Occasionally, a different list was posted: the names of people who would be allowed, at least temporarily, to go home. For those not on the list, the obvious reaction would be: Why them and not me?
Etty’s instinct was different.
One time, when a list was posted naming sixty people who were allowed to go home, Etty’s name was not on it. Not only did she not envy those going home, she felt fortunate to be staying, because by staying at camp, she would be able to help her parents.
“Luckily I am not one of those sixty,” she wrote to a friend, “so I can keep on protecting my parents as best I can. You see, there is always a new cause for satisfaction.”
Have faith
Victor Hugo wrote that a flourishing person is like the human eye, “which adjusts to gloom by becoming more open,” David Von Drehle writes, “‘just as the soul dilates in misfortune and in the end finds God.’” This is exactly what happened to Etty.
It was horror and terror that brought her, literally, to her knees. She “found herself” praying on the bathroom mat, moved by “a great urge from a deeper part of herself than her mind,” even as the “rational atheistic” part of her looked on in amazement and she felt embarrassed. It was God—whom she describes as the voice inside her—that she found and kept returning to as the outside world grew darker. Her faith gave her strength.
If God cannot help us, we must help Him
I’ve heard people ask—and have asked myself—if God is all-powerful, why does He let bad things happen? And if He’s not all-powerful, why pray?
“It’s not God’s fault that things go awry sometimes,” Etty wrote. “The cause lies in ourselves. And that’s what stays with me, even now, even when I’m about to be packed off to Poland with my whole family.”
She prayed:
“[…] one thing is becoming increasingly clear to me: that You cannot help us, that we must help You to help ourselves. And that is all we can manage these days and also all that really matters: that we safeguard that little piece of You, God, in ourselves. And perhaps in others as well. Alas, there doesn’t seem to be much You Yourself can do about our circumstances, about our lives. Neither do I hold You responsible. You cannot help us, but we must help You and defend Your dwelling place inside us to the last.”
Prayer was how she protected the place inside her that she could return to for refuge.
Grow independent from external things
While walking alongside her brother, Mischa, one day, Etty became overwhelmed by the thought of their eventual parting. She turned to him and said, “Perhaps we really have no future.”
“Perhaps,” Mischa replied, “but only if you take a materialist view…”
This was an essential key to her growth: the firm belief that nothing outside her could harm her. Nothing could touch the serene place inside her unless she allowed it. And she would not allow it.
“We must grow so independent of material and external things that whatever the circumstances our spirit can continue to do its work.” Even in the camps, “I shall simply have to carry everything inside me. One ought to be able to live without books, without anything. There will always be a small patch of sky above, and there will always be enough space to fold two hands in prayer.”
Destroy in yourself what you wish to destroy in others
One winter day, standing at a tram stop in occupied Amsterdam, Etty’s friend Jan asked bitterly, “What is it in human beings that makes them want to destroy others?” Etty responded, “Human beings, you say, but remember that you’re one yourself. The rottenness of others is in us, too.”
The solution to the biggest problem in the world—hatred—was introspection: “to turn inward and to root out all the rottenness there. To destroy in ourselves what we wish to destroy in others. And that seems to me the only lesson to be learned from this war. That we must look into ourselves and nowhere else.”
“Why is there war?” she mused. “Perhaps because now and then I might be inclined to snap at my neighbor.”
The materials for a good life are the same everywhere
Professor Andō Fumio says that one of Etty’s greatest achievements was recognizing that the basic materials for life are the same everywhere.
In Amsterdam or Westerbork, in a quiet room or a crowded barracks, the raw ingredients of life remained: time, attention, people, the sky, her own thoughts.
And because the essential things of life are everywhere, she was able to find beauty everywhere. She was able to be grateful for everything.
As she put it, if “in a labor camp I should die within three days, I should lie down and die and still not find life unfair.”
Everything is fine just as it is
Etty would cringe when people said things like, “We’ve got to make the best of things.” It suggested a sharp divide between the life we’re “supposed” to have and the shabby substitute we’re stuck with now. That mentality felt false to her, like pretending to be cheerful on a sinking ship.
“Everywhere things are both very good and very bad at the same time. The two are in balance, everywhere and always,” she wrote.
“I never have the feeling that I have got to make the best of things; everything is fine just as it is. Every situation, however miserable, is complete in itself and contains the good as well as the bad.”
What made her so joyful, even in a transit camp, was her ability to embrace life as a single, meaningful whole. Barbed wire and purple lupins, transports and sunsets, fear and gratitude: all of it belonged.
“Flowers and fruit grow everywhere they are planted, isn’t that what it all means?”
Refuse to hide from the world
Defying her friends’ pleas, Etty refused to hide from the Nazis. “She didn’t want to desert her parents, but more than that,” Carol Lee Flinders writes, “it just felt morally wrong to her that anyone would concentrate on personal survival who could be reaching out lovingly to others instead.”
Klaas Smelik, the man to whom she would later entrust her diaries, remembers his unsuccessful attempt to “kidnap” Etty and put her into hiding. Convinced she didn’t understand the danger she was in, he grabbed her to pull her to safety. She wriggled free, stepped back, and said, “You don’t understand me.” When he admitted he didn’t, she said, “I want to share the destiny of my people.” At that moment, he knew there was no hope of “rescuing” her. She would not allow it. Besides, she argued, what did it matter whether she went, or someone else?
And this was a woman who had everything going for her! She had family and friends, a law degree, ambition, curiosity, and a full, vibrant inner life.
Yet she refused to hide from her fate for the same reason she refused to hide from sorrow: to hide from it would be to hide from life itself. And beyond that, how could she run and hide when there were so many people around her she could help?
Listen, listen, listen
The whole of Etty’s transformation was built on something simple: listening. More specifically, listening to what was going on inside her. It was this kind of listening, practiced through journaling, that transformed her so profoundly.
Each morning, she resolved to turn inward for a half hour. “Thinking gets you nowhere,” she wrote. “You have to make yourself passive then, and just listen. […] Not thinking, but listening to what is going on inside you. If you do that for a while every morning . . . you acquire a calm that illuminates the whole day.”
Accept all of yourself so you can accept all of others
One evening, as she biked through Amsterdam to meet her brother, she fell into a sadness over some perceived flaw in herself. As she rode, her thoughts drifted to a kind university professor who had recently died in a concentration camp. The weight of it all—her own self-judgment, his death, the state of the world—began to settle in.
But instead of rejecting her feelings, she opened herself to them, realizing “that sadness, too, was part of my being.”
From this she realized that accepting all parts of herself made it easier to accept all parts of others, too.
Hardy, not hard
Perhaps one of the most amazing things about Etty was that she refused to let her heart grow numb.
That was her greatest fear: numbness of heart. To become numb would close her off to her inner life and prevent her from bearing witness to what was happening around her. “Eager as she was to affirm the inherent meaning and beauty of life, she would not permit herself to do so without at the same time recognizing the full depravity of what was going on around her,” Carol Lee Flinders writes. She “would uphold that part of the assignment she had imposed upon herself: to be an unblinkered witness to history, but one who would not give way to hatred.”
Root out personal desires and become whole
Part of Etty’s ability to resist hatred and numbness was rooted in something less obvious: her relationship to personal desire.
She noticed that her suffering often traced back to a single question—What do I want?
In 1942, she was in a low mood that lingered for days. When she looked closely, she saw the source clearly: her relationship with Spier (her therapist, with whom she had a complicated, semi-romantic relationship). Beneath her emotions, she had a longing for a physical relationship with him. She had an urge to possess him, to make him hers.
She realized her low moods were the result of a desperate need to place him at the center of her life. And here’s the paradox: when she let go of that need, it brought them closer. By no longer trying to “own” him, they were no longer two separate beings.
She learned to redirect and soften her desires. She saw more clearly the connectedness of all things. With a connection to everything, how could she hate? Hatred requires separation. It requires measuring and demanding and defending.
By lessening her desires, she was able to connect more deeply with others, with life, and, most importantly, with herself. She was becoming whole.
Let life be more than a thousand everyday cares
Etty would pray that her days be made up of more than just thoughts of food and clothing and the cold and her health. It didn’t matter if she had to sleep on a hard floor, or that she was no longer allowed on certain streets.
“These are minor vexations,” she wrote. “So insignificant compared with the infinite riches and possibilities we carry within us. […] Let every day be something more than a thousand everyday cares.”
Face the facts
She watched people around her cling to fantasies of rescue. They convinced themselves that help would come, that the war would suddenly change course, that they would be spared. She understood the longing behind those hopes, but she also saw how they kept people from engaging with the reality in front of them.
Etty was interested in the facts. More to the point, she was interested in how she could grow through the facts. Life is not an illusion or a hope for a different reality. Life is what it is—facts and everyday struggles. “Etty did not flee from this difficult situation,” writes Andō Fumio, “but regarded the facts as the meaning of life itself. She sought what she could do and achieve even under the most difficult conditions.”
Only by fully embracing this moment could she hope to fulfill her potential.
Life is one meaningful whole
Etty rejected the idea that life could be divided into what it should be and what it was. This is perhaps the most profound thing about her: that she could face unimaginable terror and still find life beautiful. Not just the obvious parts, but all of it.
During a time when she was temporarily allowed to go home, she reflected on camp Westerbork:
“How is it that this stretch of heathland surrounded by barbed wire, through which so much human misery has flooded, nevertheless remains inscribed in my memory as something almost lovely? How is it that my spirit, far from being oppressed, seemed to grow lighter and brighter there? It is because I read the signs of the times and they did not seem meaningless to me.”
She reminisced about her former life, about reading Rilke and Jung at her writing desk. “Surrounded by my writers and poets and the flowers on my desk, I loved life. And there among the barracks, full of hunted and persecuted people, I found confirmation of my love of life. Life in those drafty barracks was no other than life in this protected, peaceful room. Not for one moment was I cut off from the life I was said to have left behind. There was simply one great, meaningful whole.”
To ruminate is to miss out on life
Etty understood that rumination was not the same as reflection.
She knew how things like fantasies and sad memories could distract her for days on end—to no good end. It wasn’t that there was anything inherently immoral about this, but she saw clearly that it cut her off from reality.
“Observing the people around her,” Carol Lee Flinders writes, “she sees that many of them play and replay memories of fear, grief, and anger with the same avidity she’d devoted to sexual fantasies, and that because they cannot direct their attention at will, they no longer experience life directly.”
This thought helped me fall asleep the other night. I told myself: Don’t ruminate. The things keeping you up are in your head. The reality is that you’re lying in bed. Nothing else is happening. Be where your body is. Fall into the present moment, and fall asleep.
Keep seeking beauty
Walking alongside the barbed wire fences, she would find herself overcome by how beautiful life was. The beauty of a magnolia could almost overwhelm her.
For Etty, this wasn’t just appreciation—it was survival. An eye for beauty helped preserve her humanity. It allowed her to keep seeing clearly while others were consumed by resentment and reactivity. Beauty sharpened her vision when hatred threatened to cloud it. Seeking beauty was her way of staying human.
Transcend yourself
Etty put her inner world in order, wrestled with herself, and found a deep peace. Her spiritual quest allowed her to see the world differently. It’s how she could describe the beauty of life, the birds in the sky, the peaceful purple lupins, the sun shining on her face, the barbed wire, and the mass murder.
But that inner work did not end with her. By rooting out personal desires and trivial preoccupations, she made more room in herself for other people. She became a haven for others—a person able to absorb sorrow, offer comfort, and remain present to those around her.
And that is what made her transformation transcendental.
Because if that had been the sum total of her story, if she had only retreated inward, she wouldn’t have become the person she became. What made her so remarkable is that she went beyond herself.
Each week at Westerbork, a large group of people would be chosen to board the train for Poland—the destination Auschwitz—where they would likely be murdered. If your name wasn’t called, you breathed a sigh of relief. You survived another week.
Etty did not use that reprieve to retreat further into herself. Instead, she used it to comfort terrified mothers with crying babies. She used it to write reassuring letters to friends. She used it to make sure her struggling parents had everything they needed. When she had nothing else to give, she gave kindness and humor. People described her as “radiant.” She was a light that shone everywhere she went.
“Our work can be done wherever there is a human being, be he only a camp guard,” she wrote.
And she did this work right up until the end.
Her transcendence was not about escaping the world, but about seeing it whole and choosing to remain true to herself. God and horror, beauty and atrocity…to view it all in the same frame and choose love anyway.